Search This Blog

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

America's drought and its effects on corn and people


July 24, 2012

The Great Drought: Unintended Consequences?

As we all know by now our nation's corn belt is experiencing the worst drought in over 50 years.

The likely result will be a massive reduction in our corn harvest. This reduction in supply has simple economic consequences...prices for every corn-based product will increase dramatically. In addition to paying more for corn based foods, we will, of course, pay more for ethanol too. One has to give credit to the corn industry which for decades invented idea after idea to increase demand and prices for their product. Corn-based food product types have expanded for decades as more and more recipes were developed that used corn, and high fructose corn syrup massively replaced cane sugar. Then came the grandest idea of all; using corn to create ethanol that could then be substituted for gasoline. Can't you imagine these marketeers sitting around a table brainstorming ideas on how to create even more demand for their product? After all, in most capitalistic organizations, the quest for growth is an absolute constant. Suddenly a light bulb went off and someone reminded the group that the idea for producing a gasoline substitute using corn ethanol had been around as long as the automobile. The problem had always been that it cost more to produce ethanol than gasoline and thus it could not compete on price. Then the group began to think outside the box. What if, they asked, we could develop traction for an idea of substituting ethanol for gasoline because of global warming. We could certainly get the environmentalists to back the idea. What if we also sold the idea as a way of helping reduce our dependence on foreign oil? Then one excited person said...we can even tout it as a source of renewable energy! Who could resist these selling points? Then some really naive member raised a red flag; we still have a problem because we cannot produce it at a price that is lower than gasoline because it takes oil based fertilizers to raise it, more oil-based energy to produce it, and then the corn has to be hauled by trucks to distilleries and, finally, the ethanol also has to be hauled by truck to the gasoline refineries because it is too corrosive for pipelines. When all these costs are added up, the red flag bearer warned, it clearly will never actually reduce oil usage or pollution.. On top of that, this naysayer at the table said, the start up costs will be very high. To all of this, the smartest person at the table said; stop worrying so much about all of this stuff. Our objective is to increase our corn markets and this is too good an idea to pass up. We'll just turn those problems over to our lobbyists and lawyers to deal with. Of course, here's what these two groups then did; first, they had to get all of the lawmakers in the corn-producing states to support a bill that would provide government subsidies to get production distilleries built and running. Then they had to promise to make major contributions to candidates for the executive branch, and both houses of congress...for both parties. Then they coordinated campaigns by environmentalists to bring extreme pressure on the lawmakers. At the same time they launched media campaigns to demonize the oil industry, and to sell the benefits to American citizens in order to gain their support. By the time they were done it would have been un-American to even think of speaking out against this idea.

The idea was rapidly transformed from an idea to a reality today that affects every American and even the poorer inhabitants of the world who depend on our exported corn as a food staple. Prices have, as would be expected, climbed steadily higher. Corn crops have also grown commensurate with expanded demand. Prices for even non-corn grains have also skyrocketed as farmers grew less of these grains in order to convert to corn production. Our leaders obviously did agree to this idea that they were paid to support. Subsidies were created as requested by producers to help build and operate distilleries that could not have existed otherwise. And our leaders then convinced the EPA to now allow up to 15% of ethanol in every gallon of gasoline.

Now we have the great drought! Guess what will now happen to the prices of every grain-based product we consume? Most experts predict that ethanol will soon end up costing more per gallon than the gasoline it replaces, and in most states it's not just EPA allowed...it's required (thanks to lobbying at the state level). It leaves one to ponder just how much longer we will allow this corruption to continue unabated. Once again, both party's leaders, supposedly the smartest people around, have proven that they will buy into and support almost any idea if they are paid enough to do so. They clearly don't give a tinker's damn about what's truly best for we the people!

Our leaders predictable response will be that nobody can predict the weather because it is just an act of nature. They used to say an act of God...but that is now politically incorrect. Were the consequences unintended, unanticipated, or simply ignored? Are our leaders stupid or crooked? Either should get you fired.

These are my opinions. What do you think?

Mike Tower
Hendersonville, NC

No comments:

Post a Comment